Daimler Ag (Formerly Known As Mercedes-benz Ag) v. Helge Herbert Leiduck and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 4089/1994 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 April 2014.
1. Page 25, the second sentence of paragraph 42 should read: “The short answer to such objection is that the English translations should be verified to be full and accurate (if necessary by involving some one who can read doctors’ handwriting in German) and that Dr Förstl has already included in his report summaries of the information that he has obtained from the various interviewees.”
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 4089/1994 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO.4089 OF 1994 ------------------------
________________________ C O R R I G E N D A ________________________
1.Page 25, the second sentence of paragraph 42 should read: “The short answer to such objection is that the English translations should be verified to be full and accurate (if necessary by involving someone who can read doctors’ handwriting in German) and that Dr Förstl has already included in his report summaries of the information that he has obtained from the various interviewees.” 2.Page 29, the first sentence of paragraph 49 should read: “However, I think one can be forgiven for not showing the Defendants the sympathy that is usually extended to the party at the receiving end of this kind of application.”
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 4089/1994