“22. On 28 December 2011, the DLS by a letter informed the Director that they had no instructions from the applicant. On 30 December 2011, the Director replied to DLS stating that he would deal with the applicant directly in respect of the CAT claim given that DLS did not have instructions from the applicant.”
with due respect, I would like to say that I am disagree with the decision of the [Director] about my torture claim because I never given give any screening interview and [the Director] refuse my torture claim. …”
“(1) The applicant was some 3.5 months late in filing the Petition. However, in the Petition, he did not ask for any extension of time or give any reasons for the delay. The Petition had therefore “violated the rules of procedures procedure” and was thus dismissed (paragraph 1 of the Decision).”
“66. I therefore do not think the applicant adjudicator had failed to discharge his duty to make inquiry in his disposition of the applicant’s lateness in lodging the Petition. … ”
(C.F. Tam)
Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Au
High Court
Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error