Re Wong Kam Shing
|
HCAG 3566/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE APPLICATION FOR GRANT NO 3566 OF 2012
_________________________
_____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ 1.This hearing is to resolve the disputes over the caveat filed in this application. 2.There was a caveat filed by Wong Ka Tsun (“the Caveator”) under rule 44 of the Non-Contentious Probate Rules (Cap.10A) against the application for a grant of administration of the estate of the deceased Wong Kam Shing ( 黃金城 ) by Madam Lin Xinzhen ( 林杏珍) (“Madam Lin”). 3.The Caveator applied for a grant of administration of the deceased’s estate alongside with Madam Lin or on his own. 4.Madam Lin had filed a summons on 21 January 2013 for the dismissal of the Caveator’s application together with an affirmation filed on 21 January 2013 in opposition. 5.There was therefore a dispute over the appointment of the administrator/administrators for the administration of the deceased’s estate. 6.Ms. Mak, solicitor of Messrs. Wong, Hui & Co. acts for the Caveator. Mr. Leung, solicitor of Messrs. Li, Wong, Lam & W.I. Cheung acts for Madam Lin. 7.Messrs. Cheung & Choy, solicitors, had filed a Notice of Change of Solicitors dated 2 August 2013 with the court in relation to this matter. By their letter dated 30 October 2013, this firm of solicitors said that the Notice was a mistake and asked the court to disregard it. 8.By a letter dated 8 May 2014, Madam Lin’s solicitors enclosed a copy consent summons between it and the Caveator’s solicitors containing the terms of settlement of the disputes over the appointment of the administrator by way of appointment of an independent administrator under section 36 of the Probate Administration Ordinance (Cap. 10) for the court’s attention. 9.Because of Mr. Cheung’s mistake in filing and serving the Notice of Change of Solicitors, there was an issue taken by the Caveator that Mr. Cheung should not be acting as the independent administrator. There is a dispute over the application for the discharge of Mr. Cheung to be replaced by another solicitor agreed by Madam Lin and the Caveator. 10.The parties ask for a short adjournment for negotiation over the above issue, which request was acceded to. After the adjournment, the parties confirm that they have reached an agreement over the matter and they agree that an order in the following terms should be made for the resolution of their disputes:
11.By consent of the parties, the above are made in terms of this order, which I now make.
Ms. C. Mak, of Wong, Hui & Co., for the caveator Mr. S. Leung, of Li, Wong, Lam & W.I. Cheung, for the applicant Mr. S.Cheung, of Cheung & Choy, for the independent solicitor administrator |