Common Luck Investment Ltd. v. Cheung Siu Ming
|
CACV000016A/1998 1998, No. 16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL
---------------------- Coram : Hon. Godfrey, Leong and Rogers, JJ.A. in court Date of Hearing : 22 September 1998 Date of Judgment : 22 September 1998 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Godfrey, J.A. (giving the judgment of the court) : 1. In Heath v. Pugh (1881) 6 Q.B.D. 345 (affirmed (1882) 7 App. Cas. 235), it appears to have been decided (I read from the headnote in the report of the case in the Court of Appeal) that :-
2. The case is not an easy one to follow. But, the plaintiff here, who seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, bases on it this proposition, that the effect of a sale by a legal mortgagee is the same as the effect of an order of foreclosure absolute. This submission conflicts with the views expressed in the judgment of this court. But the plaintiff has made out sufficient of an argument to justify the point being considered by the Court of Final Appeal. 3. We will therefore give leave to the plaintiff to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, pursuant to those provisions in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance under which we have a discretion, in a case where we consider a point worthy of consideration by that court, to give an applicant leave to appeal to it.
Representation: Mr. Allen Yau (M/s. John Ip & Co.) for Applicant (Plaintiff/Appellant) Mr. K.M. Chong (M/s. Wong Hui & Co. assigned by D.L.A.) for Respondent (Defendant/Respondent) |