|
[English Translation - 英譯本]
CACC 284/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 284 OF 2013
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 111 OF 2013)
_________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
HKSAR |
Respondent |
|
and |
|
|
TSO KIN SHING
（曹建成） |
Applicant/
(Defendant) |
_________________
CAAR 3/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW NO. 3 OF 2013
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 111 OF 2013)
_________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE |
Applicant |
|
and |
|
|
TSO KIN SHING
（曹建成） |
Respondent/
(Defendant) |
_________________
(Heard Together)
| Coram： Hon Cheung JA, Barnes and D Pang JJ in Court |
| Date of Hearing： 21 February 2014 |
| Date of Judgment： 21 February 2014 |
| Date of Reasons for Judgment： 14 March 2014 |
| Date of Corrigendum : 11 April 2014 |
CORRIGENDUM
Please note the following amendment to the Reasons for Judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 14 March 2014:
Paragraph 1.3 on page 3: “At the hearing, we first dealt with the defendant’s application for leave to appeal his convictions. We allowed his application and, treating the application as the appeal proper, we allowed the appeal, quashed the convictions and set aside the sentences. We ordered that the case be retried. This decision rendered it unnecessary for us to determine the application by the Secretary for Justice for review of sentence. Our reasons for allowing the defendant’s appeal are set out below.”
Dated this 11th day of April 2014
|
(Candy Lau)
Clerk to the Hon Mr. Justice Cheung,
|
|
Justice of Appeal, High Court |
Translated by the Judgment Translation Unit of the Judiciary and vetted by
Mr. Edmund Cham, Solicitor.
|