Aspial Investment Ltd and Another v. Mayer Corporation Development International Ltd

Case No.HCA 238/2012

Court

High Court CFI

Date17 Jul 2014

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

FACV No 17 of 2013

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO 17 OF 2013 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO 162 OF 2012)

________________________

HCA No 238 of 2012

BETWEEN

	ASPIAL INVESTMENT LIMITED	1^st Plaintiff (1^st Respondent)
	BUMPER EAST LIMITED	2^nd Plaintiff (2^nd Respondent)
	and
	MAYER CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	Defendant (Appellant)

HCCL No 3 of 2012

AND BETWEEN

	MAYER CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	Plaintiff (Appellant)
	and
	ALLIANCE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE LIMITED	1^st Defendant (1^st Respondent)
	CHAN WAI DUNE CHARLES（陳維端）	2^nd Defendant (2^nd Respondent)
	LAM CHIN CHUN（林前進）	3^rd Defendant (3^rd Respondent)
	BUMPER EAST LIMITED	4^th Defendant (4^th Respondent)
	ASPIAL INVESTMENT LIMITED	5^th Defendant (5^th Respondent)

________________________

(Consolidated by Order of the Honourable Mr Justice Reyes
dated 22^nd day of March 2012)

Court :

Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ, Mr Justice Chan NPJ and Mr Justice Gummow NPJ

Date of Hearing and Judgment : 3 July 2014

Date of handing down Judgment : 17 July 2014

Date of Corrigendum: 29 July 2014

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

1.At the first line of page 10, paragraph 21, “fraudulent collision” should read “fraudulent collusion”.

2.At the bottom of page 12, the name of the Counsel instructed by Samuel L C Yang & Co for the 1^st & 2^nd plaintiffs in HCA 238/2012 and the 4^th & 5^th defendants in HCCL 3/2012 / 4^th & 5^th respondents should be Mr Frederick H F Chan instead of Mr Fredrick H F Chan.