Read the full judgment text of DCCC 851/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 25 August 2014.
1. The first charge, against both D1 and D2, alleged that they conspired as agents to use a document, with intent to deceive their principal, contrary to sections 9(3) and 12(1) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap 201 and sections 159A and 159C of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. The document concerned is a minutes of meeting of the board of directors of Biogrowth Assets Limited (BAL), which was a wholly owned subsidiary of China Mining Resources Group Limited (CMRG), a company listed o
Cited by 3 cases