中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司 (前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司) v. Wang Hu Alias Won So Foo and Others

Case No.HCMP 852/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date18 Dec 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCMP 852/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO852 OF 2014

____________

 

IN THE MATTER of the Deferred Shares in OCEAN TRAMPING COMPANY, LIMITED

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of Section 52 of the Trustee Ordinance, Cap 29

_____________

BETWEEN

  中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司
(前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司)
Plaintiff

and

  WANG HU alias WON SO FOO (汪滸別名汪索福) 1st Defendant
  KAM WING KAI alias LIU TUNG PING
(金永佳別名劉東萍)
2nd Defendant
  LI PAIO alias LEU SEN NAM
(李彪別名柳心男)
3rd Defendant
  LU XIAN WANG alias LIU CHANG
(呂先旺別名劉誠)
4th Defendant
  TSANG KWOK KIU alias SUN CHONG YIN
(曾閣橋別名孫仲穎)
5th Defendant
  CHE BING JIU alias CHEN KAU WEI
(車炳久別名陳高為)
6th Defendant
  ZHENG TAO alias CHENG MIN HWEU
(鄭濤別名鄭明慧)
7th Defendant
  NG FAI alias CHIH YUNG PAO
(吳輝別名池原普)
8th Defendant
  YU YOU GANG alias FUNG HAI CHIN
(余有剛別名馮海清)
9th Defendant

_____________

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers
Date of Hearing:18 December 2014
Date of Judgment: 18 December 2014

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.This is an application by the plaintiff for vesting orders against 9 defendants as trustees for shares to be returned to the plaintiff under section 52(1) of the Trustee Ordinance, Cap 29.

2.The defendants hold a total of 80,500 deferred shares in Ocean Tramping Company, Limited (“the shares”) particularized as follows:

Defendant No of shares
1st 8,000
2nd 9,500
3rd 8,000
4th 9,500
5th 9,500
6th 9,500
7th 9,500
8th 9,000
9th 8,000

3.The defendants have respectively executed declarations of trust dated 30 October 1990 attested before a Hong Kong solicitor declaring that they hold the shares on trust for the plaintiff.  The original share certificates have been kept by the plaintiff.  The defendants have not participated in the affairs of Ocean Tramping.

4.By letters dated 23 January 2014, the plaintiff’s solicitors demanded each defendant to contact the former to arrange for transfer of the shares under his name to the plaintiff within 28 days.  The letters were sent to the last known address of each of the defendants (“collectively the last known addresses”) stated on the declarations of trust.  The letter to D1 was marked “moved out”.  The one to D2 was marked “refuse to accept”. The ones to D3, D6, D7 and D9 were returned.  The ones to D4, D5 and D8 met with no response.

5.The plaintiff has lost contact with the defendants.  Searches have been made at the Births and Deaths Registry (covering 30/10/1990 to 4/5/2014) but no record of the defendants’ death was found. 

6.Diligent attempts to serve the court process have been made at the last known addresses, including by registered post (all unclaimed), paying actual visits, making enquiries with neighbours and caretaker’s office (where available) and land searches of the properties at the last known addresses.

7.Pursuant to the order of Master M Wong, substituted service of these proceedings and the notice of appointment was effected by an advertisement in the Sing Dao Daily, together with service by ordinary post and insertion into the letter box at the last known addresses.  Accordingly, I can proceed under section 58 of the Trustee Ordinance to hear this case in the absence of the defendant.

8.It is clear that the defendants have been holding the shares on trust for the plaintiff under an express trust.  The trustees cannot now be found and have neglected to transfer the shares to the plaintiff for 28 days after the written request for transfer was made.  Pursuant to section 52(1)(b)(iii) and (iv) of the Trustee Ordinance, I order that:

(1)   the right to transfer the deferred shares registered in the name of each of the defendant in Ocean Tramping Company, Limited and the right to receive the dividends accrued or to accrue thereon prior to the transfer of the share be vested in the plaintiff;

(2)   the plaintiff may thereafter transfer the shares to itself or to any other person or entity as the plaintiff may desire; and

(3)   there be no order as to costs.

9.I thank counsel for his assistance.

(Queeny Au-Yeung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Sunny Chan, instructed by Eddie Lee & Company, for the plaintiff

The defendants were not represented and did not appear