BabelCite

Dr Chan Po Sum v. The Medical Council of Hong Kong

Read the full judgment text of CACV 103/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 December 2014.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 103/2013
Court
Court of Appeal
Date09 Dec 2014
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 103/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE MEDICAL COUNCIL

OF HONG KONG MADE ON 24th APRIL 2013)

________________________

BETWEEN

  DR CHAN PO SUM Appellant
  and
  THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF HONG KONG Respondent

________________________

Before: Hon Kwan, Barma JJA and Poon J in Court
Date of Hearing: 25 November 2014
Date of Judgment: 9 December 2014
Date of Corrigendum : 24 December 2014

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment:-

On the third and fourth lines of paragraph 52 on page 23 :

“… the Bolam principle “is not relevant to professional negligence”.”  should read “… the Bolam principle “is not relevant to professional misconduct”.”

Dated this 24th  day of December 2014

     (Arison Bau)
    Clerk to Hon Kwan JA

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Dr Chan Po Sum v. The Medical Council of Hong Kong
CACV 103/2013
Court of Appeal09 Dec 2014
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 103/2013

Dr Chan Po Sum v. The Medical Council of Hong Kong
Court of Appeal09 Dec 2014