Melvin Waxman v. Li Fei Yu and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1973/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 January 2015.

1. In paragraph 39, the word “P” should be replaced by “ the Subject Ds ” wherever it appears.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1973/2012
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Jan 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1973/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

HIGH COURT ACTION NO 1973 OF 2012

____________

BETWEEN

  MELVIN WAXMAN
(SUING ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER SHAREHOLDERS
OF THE 9TH DEFENDANT, EXCEPT LI FEI YU,
THE 1ST DEFENDANT HEREIN)
Plaintiff
 

and
  LI FEI YU
1st Defendant
  SOLUT (HONG KONG) COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
  ROI LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
3rd Defendant
  SEIRYU (HONG KONG) INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
4th Defendant
  AXENT CORPORATION LIMITED
5th Defendant
  SWELL INTERNATIONAL TRADING
CO LIMITED
6th Defendant
  TOP CHINA CORPORATION LIMITED
7th Defendant
  B & R INTERNATIONAL
(HONG KONG) LIMITED
8th Defendant
  WDI INTERNATIONAL (HK) LIMITED
9th Defendant

____________

Before:  Deputy High Court Judge Marlene Ng in Chambers
Date of Hearing:  21 October 2014
Date of Handing Down Judgment:  30 January 2015

___________________

C O R R I G E N D U M
___________________

1.In paragraph 39, the word “P” should be replaced by “the Subject Ds” wherever it appears.

2.In the first line of paragraph 41, the word “P” should read “the Subject Ds”.

3.In the fourth line of paragraph 41, the word “P’s” should read “the Subject Ds’”.

Dated the 6th day of February 2015.

(NG Kwok-sun, Sunny)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Marlene Ng