Melvin Waxman v. Li Fei Yu and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1973/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 January 2015.
1. In paragraph 39, the word “P” should be replaced by “ the Subject Ds ” wherever it appears.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 1973/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE HIGH COURT ACTION NO 1973 OF 2012 ____________ BETWEEN
____________
___________________ C O R R I G E N D U M 1.In paragraph 39, the word “P” should be replaced by “the Subject Ds” wherever it appears. 2.In the first line of paragraph 41, the word “P” should read “the Subject Ds”. 3.In the fourth line of paragraph 41, the word “P’s” should read “the Subject Ds’”. Dated the 6th day of February 2015.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1973/2012