MELVIN WAXMAN(suing on behalf of himself and all other shareholders of the 9thDefendant, except LI FEI-YU, the 1stDefendant herein) v LI FEI YU

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1973/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 August 2013.

1. I have before me two summonses taken out by the 2 nd and 4 th to 8 th defendants (the “Corporate Defendants”).  By their first summons dated 7 December 2012 (“1 st Summons”), the Corporate Defendants apply to strike out the plaintiff’s (“Plaintiff’s”) writ of summons and statement of claim dated 6 November 2012 (“SOC”), which is an action brought on behalf of the 9 th defendant (the “Company”).  On 14 February 2013, the Plaintiff amended the SOC as he was entitled to under Order 20 rules 1(1)

Cited by 11 cases · Cites 2 cases