HKSAR v. Vw-ves (HK) Ltd and Others

Case No.
Court
Date12 Feb 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%

FAMC No. 69 of 2014

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 69 OF 2014 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 742 OF 2013)

____________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and
  VW-VES (HK) LIMITED 1st Applicant
  VEOLIA WATER SOUTH CHINA LIMITED 2nd Applicant
  LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS (ASIA) LIMITED 3rd Applicant
  JOHN HOLLAND PTY LIMITED 4th Applicant

____________________

Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 6 February 2015
Date of Reasons for Determination: 12 February 2015
Date of Corrigendum: 13 February 2015

____________________

CORRIGENDUM
____________________

Please note the following amendment in the Reasons for Determination dated 12 February 2015:

On page 2 at paragraph 4:

the last sentence  –  “… that defence was established on the facts.” should read “… that defence was not established on the facts.”

Dated this 13th day of February 2015.

  (Phemie Chan) (Ms)
  for Registrar, CFA
HKSAR v. Vw-ves (HK) Ltd and Others [] | BabelCite