Kong Kwok Keung v. Commissioner of Police
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 128/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 March 2015.
1. Page 13, paragraph 27 line R:
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 128/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 128 OF 2012 ____________
____________
_________________ C O R R I G E N D A _________________ 1.Page 13, paragraph 27 line R: “Court of Appeal’s decision.” should be deleted. 2.Page 15, paragraph 30 line P-Q: “As to Grounds (2) and (3), Mr Kwok, for the Applicant, submitted that Applicant was in restricted duties and firearms as a matter of routine and precaution.” should read “As to Grounds (2) and (3), Mr Kwok, for the Applicant, submitted that Applicant was restricted in his duties and carrying firearms as a matter of routine and precaution.” 3.Page 16, paragraph 33 line M: “Ii was the Applicant who revealed it and there was no concealment.” should read “It was the Applicant who revealed it and there was no concealment.” Dated the 15th day of April 2015
| |||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 128/2012