Designing Hong Kong Ltd v. The Town Planning Board
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 49/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 April 2015.
1. On page 8, the 3 rd line of paragraph 23, “bidding” should read “binding”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 49/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 49 OF 2014 _______________
_______________
_______________
______________ CORRIGENDUM
1.On page 8, the 3rd line of paragraph 23, “bidding” should read “binding”. 2.On page 10, the 6th line of paragraph 28, “It would therefore not in the interest …” should read “It would therefore not be in the interest …”. 3.On page 26, the 1st and 2nd lines of paragraph 55, “… at least some of issues raised in the judicial review…” should read “… at least some of the issues raised in the judicial review…”. Dated the 11th day of May 2015
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 49/2014