Designing Hong Kong Ltd v. The Town Planning Board

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 49/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 April 2015.

1. On page 3, line P, “… as amicus curiae . The amicus has made” should read “… as amici curaie . The amici have made”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 49/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Apr 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 49/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 49 OF 2014

_______________

  IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Designing Hong Kong Limited for leave to apply for judicial review pursuant to Order 53 rule 3 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131)

_______________

BETWEEN
  DESIGNING HONG KONG LIMITED Applicant
and
  THE TOWN PLANNING BOARD Respondent

_______________

Before: Hon Au J in Chambers
Dates of Hearing: 16 and 17 December 2014
Date of Judgment: 30 April 2015

______________

2nd CORRIGENDUM
______________

Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 30 April 2015:

1.On page 3, line P, “… as amicus curiae. The amicus has made” should read “… as amici curaie. The amici have made”.

2.On page 8, line O, “the litigation is one which…” should read “the litigation are ones which …”.

3.On page 8, line P, “that context is the…” should read “that context are the…”.

Dated the 31st day of  July 2015

(Abby Wan)(Miss)
Clerk to Hon Au J