Poon Ka Man Jason v. Cheng Wai Tao and Others

Case No.CACV 135/2013

Court

Court of Appeal

Date21 Jan 2015

Judge—

Case Document

100%

CACV 135/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 304 OF 2011)

________________________

BETWEEN
	POON KA MAN JASON (Suing on behalf of himself and all other shareholders in Smart Wave Limited except the 1^st Defendant)	Plaintiff
	and
	CHENG WAI TAO	1^st Defendant
	SMART WAVE LIMITED	2^nd Defendant
	JOYFUL GAIN LIMITED	3^rd Defendant
	PERFECT PLAN LIMITED	4^th Defendant
	REGAL WELL LIMITED	5^th Defendant
	WELL KEEN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	6^th Defendant
	WISE MASTER DEVELOPMENT LIMITED	7^th Defendant
	CHARM GOLD LIMITED	8^th Defendant
	PACIFIC GIANT LIMITED	9^th Defendant
	FAITHFUL GAIN LIMITED	10^th Defendant
	OCEAN PROFIT ENTERPRISES LIMITED	11^th Defendant
	BONWAY LIMITED	12^th Defendant
	STAR WAVE TRADING LIMITED	13^th Defendant
	SANDER LIMITED	14^th Defendant
	WISE FAITH INVESTMENTS LTD	15^th Defendant
	GOLD WISDOM TRADING LIMITED	16^th Defendant
	WISE HERO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	17^th Defendant
	PROFIT STAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED	18^th Defendant
	LAMWAY LIMITED	19^th Defendant
	OCEAN PIONEER DEVELOPMENT LIMITED	20^th Defendant
	RICHTOP LIMITED	21^st Defendant
	FOREVER WINNER LIMITED	22^nd Defendant
	WAY TIME LIMITED	23^rd Defendant
	SILVER WAVE INVESTMENTS LIMITED	24^th Defendant
	WELL FORCE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	25^th Defendant
	WIN NOBLE LIMITED	26^th Defendant
	DRAGON PERFECT LIMITED	27^th Defendant
	WISE PROGRESS HOLDINGS LIMITED	28^th Defendant
	WIN ELITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	29^th Defendant
	WISE GENIUS INVESTMENTS LIMITED	30^th Defendant
	WISE TEAM LIMITED	31^st Defendant

________________________

Before : Hon Cheung, Yuen and Chu JJA in Court

Dates of Hearing : 25 and 26 November 2014

Date of Judgment : 21 January 2015

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

1.On page 27, paragraph 7.2, the first line should read: “Mr. Shieh submitted that it was wrong to limit the”.

2.On page 29, paragraph 9, the first sentence should read: “There will be an order nisi that Smart Wave is to have 90% (because of its failure on the issue of the temporal limit) of the costs of the appeal and cross appeal and below.”

Dated this 9^th day of February 2015

	(Hebe Lam) (Miss)
	Clerk to Hon. Cheung JA

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 135/2013

Poon Ka Man Jason v. Cheng Wai Tao and Others

Court of Appeal

21 Jan 2015

Poon Ka Man Jason v. Cheng Wai Tao and Others

Court of Appeal

08 May 2015

Full analysis