Read the full judgment text of FCMC 4191/2012 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 30 June 2015 before Deputy District Judge I. Wong.
Family litigation – Costs – Expert evidence – Psychologist report – Immigration report – Unreasonable conduct – District Court – Matrimonial Causes – Costs order nisi varied – Petitioner bears 2/3 of Respondent's costs – Psychologist report application deemed unreasonable – Immigration report application not wholly unreasonable – 2/3 apportionment to psychologist report, 1/3 to immigration report
Legal issues: Costs for psychologist expert report · Costs for immigration expert report
Outcome: Costs order nisi varied; Petitioner to bear 2/3 of Respondent's costs
Cites 2 cases