Pacific Harbor Advisors Pte Ltd and Another v. Winson Federal Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1257/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 August 2014.

1. In paragraph 154(v), “Ds be given leave to defend on the rest of Ps’ claims in the ASOC” should read “The 1 st and 2 nd Defendants be given leave to defend on the rest of Ps’ monetary claims against them in the ASOC”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1257/2013
Court
High Court CFI
Date01 Aug 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1257/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1257 OF 2013

_______________

BETWEEN
PACIFIC HARBOR ADVISORS PTE LTD 1st Plaintiff
PACIFIC HARBOUR SPECIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff
and
WINSON FEDERAL LIMITED 1st Defendant
FREDERICK KAN KA CHONG
(in his capacity as the executor of the Estate of Cho Yuk Kei Carlos)
2nd Defendant
CHO WOON MING VINCENT 3rd Defendant
INTERNATIONAL HOTELIERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 4th Defendant
UP SPEED INVESTMENTS LIMITED 5th Defendant
RANMARK INVESTMENTS LIMITED 6th Defendant
FURAMA (SHENYANG) COMPANY LIMITED 7th Defendant

_________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge B Chu in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 10 June 2014
Date of Judgment: 1 August 2014
Date of Corrigendum: 24 July 2015

________________

CORRIGENDUM
________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 1 August 2014:-

1.In paragraph 154(v), “Ds be given leave to defend on the rest of Ps’ claims in the ASOC” should read “The 1st and 2nd Defendants be given leave to defend on the rest of Ps’ monetary claims against them in the ASOC”.

Dated the 24th day of July 2015

(Samuel LI)
Clerk to Hon B Chu J