Yu Fung Co Ltd v. Olympic City Properties Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1084/2008 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 July 2015.

1. Paragraph 91, line B, after the words “…of §90 above.”, add the following sentence: “Lai’s counterclaim is dismissed.”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1084/2008
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Jul 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1084/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1084 OF 2008

________________________

  IN THE MATTER OF a Property comprised in a First Legal Charge dated 18 September 1997 and registered in the Land Registry by Memorial No 7308915, namely, Flat D, 20th Floor, Profit Mansion, No 23 Fei Fung Street, Kowloon
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF Order 88 Rule 1 and Order 28 of the Rules of the High Court
BETWEEN
  YU FUNG COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff
and
  OLYMPIC CITY PROPERTIES LIMITED 1st Defendant
  LAI MING TAK TOMMY ALEXANDER 2nd Defendant

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Leung in court
Date of Hearing: 26, 28 November 2013
Date of Judgment: 30 July 2015

________________________

CORRIGENDUM
________________________

Please note the following amendment in the Judgment handed down on 30 July 2015:

1.Paragraph 91, line B, after the words “…of §90 above.”, add the following sentence: “Lai’s counterclaim is dismissed.”.

Dated the 3rd  day of August 2015.

(S. W. TAM)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Leung