New judgments

申索人根據日期為2025年10月20日的傳票，就原訟法庭暫委法官黃若鋒（「黃法官」）於2025年3月6日的判決（「上訴許可判決書」） 向本庭提出上訴（「傳票」） 。根據民事上訴司法常務官於2025年10月24日的指示，法庭將傳票視作針對黃法官根據《勞資審裁處條例》第32條給予許可的上訴及在2025年9月9日所作出的判決向上訴庭申請逾期上訴許可。

2025年6月4日，土地審裁處 (「審裁處」) 成員彭浩泉(「彭成員」) 頒下判決 (「正審判決」)， [1] 判定答辯人須將「九龍觀塘功樂道21號凱德大廈B座16/F 7室」(「該涉案處所」) 的空置管有權交還申請人，並須支付申請人由2025年3月6日至交回該涉案處所的空置管有權為止的欠租/中間收益，以每月港幣14,500元計算。

On 20 March 2024, this court (Barma JA and Lisa Wong J) handed down a judgment dismissing the applicant’s application for extension of time to appeal against the decision of DHCJ KW Lung dated 23 July 2021 refusing to grant leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review. The applicant had sought to review the decision of the Director of Immigration refusing the applicant’s request to make a subsequent non‑refoulement claim under section 37ZO of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap 115).

This is an application for extension of time to appeal against the decision of DHCJ K.W. Lung (“the Judge”) dated 9 June 2022 [1] (“the JR Decision”, as contained in “the CALL-1 Form” dated the same) refusing leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review.

This is an application for extension of time to appeal against the decision of DHCJ K.W. Lung (“the Judge”) dated 23 February 2022 (“the Leave Decision”) refusing leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review. The intended judicial review was against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”) given on 13 August 2018 (“Board’s Decision”) dismissing the applicant’s appeal against the decisions of the Director of Immigration (“the Director”) given on 23 September 2015 a