Read the full judgment text of HCAL 63/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 September 2015.
1. This is an application for judicial review of the refusal by the Bar Council of the Hong Kong Bar Association to give permission to the applicant, then a practising barrister, to engage in neuro-beautology as a supplementary occupation. The applicant relies upon two grounds for judicial review: first, that paragraph 23 of the Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“Code of Conduct” or simply “Code”), pursuant to which the Bar Council’s decision was made, i
Cites 3 cases