Read the full judgment text of CACC 424/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 June 2016.
1. The appellants were convicted on 6 December 2013 after trial before P Li J and a jury for offences under section 9 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap 201 (“POBO”). The 1 st appellant was convicted of 4 offences (counts 1-4) of, being an agent, accepting an advantage contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the POBO and the 2 nd appellant of 4 offences (counts 5-8) of offering an advantage to an agent, namely, the 1 st appellant, contrary to section 9(2)(a) of the same ordinance. These offences
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case