HKSAR v. Ma Sin Chi and Another

Read the full judgment text of CACC 424/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 15 July 2016.

1. Paragraph 1, line D, “section 83V of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap. 221” should read as “section 83E of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap. 221” ;

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 424/2013
Court
Court of Appeal
Date15 Jul 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 424/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 323 OF 2012)

____________

BETWEEN
  HKSAR
Respondent
  and
  MA SIN CHI (馬善智) 1st Appellant
  HA BUT YEE (哈弼意) 2nd Appellant

____________

Before: Hon Lunn VP, Macrae and McWalters JJA in Court
Date of Hearing: 17 June and 11 July 2016
Date of Judgment: 17 June and 11 July 2016
Date of Reasons for Judgment: 15 July 2016

_________________________

C O R R I G E N D A

_________________________


The following amendments are made to the Reasons for Judgment dated 15 July 2016:

1.Paragraph 1, line D, “section 83V of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap. 221” should read as “section 83E of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap. 221” ;

2.Paragraph 21, line H, “the relationship of agent and principle” should read as “the relationship of agent and principal”;

3.Paragraph 27, line S, “to the fixing updates within 28 days hereof” should read as “for fixing of the trial dates within 28 days hereof”;

4.Paragraph 28, line E, “to be taxes not agreed” should read as “to be taxed if not agreed”;

5.The representation of the Respondent should read as “Mr Martin Hui SC, DDPP and Ms Peggy Lo, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent”.

Dated the 20th day of July 2016.

  (Kate Fan)
Clerk to Hon Lunn VP