Read the full judgment text of CACC 367/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 August 2016.
1. The applicant was tried in the District Court on a joint charge, with one other, of dealing with property known or believed to represent the proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to section 25(1) and (3) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap 455. He pleaded not guilty to the charge but on 16 October 2014, was convicted after a trial before District Judge Sham (“the judge”). His co-accused, D1, pleaded guilty to this offence and also to a charge of using a false instrument,
Cites 1 case