Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 663/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 17 July 2017.
1. In the decision handed down on 14 February 2017 (“the Costs Decision”), it is the findings of this court that the Sanctioned Offer made by the defendants is not valid to attract the costs consequences in Order 22 rule 23. However, based on the findings that the plaintiffs should have commenced these proceedings in the SCT, the application for variation of the Costs Order Nisi by the defendants was allowed to the extent that costs should be taxed as if the claim had been brought in the SCT.
Cited by 10 cases · Cites 2 cases