BabelCite

Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 579/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 28 June 2017.

1. At page 2 in paragraph 3 near Line I, the sentence “that is two years ago” be amended as “that is three years ago”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 579/2013
Court
District Court
Date28 Jun 2017
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 579/2013

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 579 OF 2013

________________________

BETWEEN
  SOSHILA KESWANI Plaintiff
and
  MOTIRAM KESWANI Defendant

________________________

Before: His Honour Judge Edmond Lee in Court
Date of Hearing: 28 June 2017
Date of Decision: 28 June 2017
Date of Corrigendum: 24 July 2017

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

Please note that the following amendment be made to the Decision dated 28 June 2017:

1.At page 2 in paragraph 3 near Line I, the sentence “that is two years ago” be amended as “that is three years ago”.

  (Edmond Au)
Clerk to His Honour Judge Edmond Lee

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
DCCJ 579/2013
District Court30 Aug 2019
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 579/2013

Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court20 May 2015
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court20 May 2015
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court24 Jun 2016
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court28 Jun 2017
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court03 Jul 2017
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court
Full analysis
31 Jan 2019
Soshila Keswani v. Motiram Keswani
District Court30 Aug 2019