Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Another v. President of the Legislative Council
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 223/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 July 2017.
1. In paragraph 65 at p 27T, “There is no question that it can be said to be unconstitutional” should read “There is no question that it is constitutional ”.
Cites 2 cases
|
HCAL 223/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 223 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCAL 224/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 224 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCAL 225/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 225 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCAL 226/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 226 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCMP 3378/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3378 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCMP 3379/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3379 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCMP 3381/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3381 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ AND HCMP 3382/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3382 OF 2016 _______________
_______________ (heard together)
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ 1.In paragraph 65 at p 27T, “There is no question that it can be said to be unconstitutional” should read “There is no question that it is constitutional”. 2.In paragraph 77 at p 31J, “…the LegCo must be in the form set out in…” should read “…the LegCo Oath…”. 3.In paragraph 135(2) at p 55R, “…whether a legislature was sincere…” should read “…a legislator…”. 4.In the English translation in paragraph 153 at p 63S, “…hide it with a he:…” should read “…hide it with a lie:”. 5.In paragraph 226 at p 90H-I, “…intended…to lose his or seat…” should read “…intended…to lose his or her seat…”. 6.In paragraph 237(4)(a) at p 95D-E, “…has filed his 3rd affirmation disposing that…” should read “…has filed his 3rd affirmation deposing that”. 7.In light of paragraph 237(4)(a) at p 95E-F, in paragraph 253 at p 102Q-R, “…the Geographic Constituency…” should read “…the Geographic Constituencies…”. Dated the 27th day of July 2017.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 223/2016