Read the full judgment text of CACV 182/2015 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 30 August 2017 before Hon Lam VP, Cheung and Chu JJA.
Ancillary relief – Beneficial ownership – Adverse inference – Hearsay evidence – Non-disclosure – Divorce – Property – Whether adverse inference on beneficial ownership was proper – Yes – Whether adverse inference on value was proper – Yes – Whether hearsay evidence was admissible – Yes – Appeal dismissed, costs to respondent
Legal issues: Adverse inference on beneficial ownership · Adverse inference on value · Admissibility of hearsay evidence
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case