HKSAR v. Special View Ltd

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 63/2017 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.

1. We are satisfied that leave should be granted in respect of the following question of law, namely:

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.FAMC 63/2017[2018] HKCFA 25
Court
FAMC
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 63 of 2017

[2018] HKCFA 25

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 63 OF 2017 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM

HCMA NO. 596 OF 2016)

_____________________

Between

HKSAR Applicant
and
SPECIAL VIEW LIMITED Respondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee : Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Stock NPJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 15 May 2018

_____________________

DETERMINATION

_____________________

The Appeal Committee :

1.We are satisfied that leave should be granted in respect of the following question of law, namely:

“What is the effect, if any, on an appeal made under section 16(1)(c) of the Marine Fish Culture Ordinance, Cap 353 against a decision to cancel a licence under section 9(1) on the period of validity of a licence if as at the time the appeal was made, the date of expiry of the licence has passed and no application to renew the licence has been made?”

2.The appeal will be heard on 19 October 2018.

(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Robert Tang)
Permanent Judge
(Frank Stock)
Non-Permanent Judge

Ms Vinci Lam, SADPP and Ms Hermina NG, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr Henry LW Fung, instructed by Francis Kong & Co, for the Respondent