Rai Jun Prasad v. Pacific Crown Security Services Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 214/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 May 2018.
1. In these personal injury proceedings I found that Mr Prasad had been contributory negligent to the extent of 20%. In §46 of the judgment I set out the calculation of the pre-trial loss of earnings.
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCPI 214/2016 [2018] HKCFI 1086 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 214 OF 2016 _____________
_____________
____________________ CORRIGENDUM ____________________ Please note the following corrections made by Deputy High Court Judge Saunders to the Judgment dated 18 May 2018: 1.In these personal injury proceedings I found that Mr Prasad had been contributory negligent to the extent of 20%. In §46 of the judgment I set out the calculation of the pre-trial loss of earnings. 2.The solicitors for the defendants have drawn my attention to the fact that I have incorrectly deducted an employee’s compensation settlement at that point. The correct point at which employee’s compensation should be deducted is after the adjustment for contributory negligence. 3.The correct calculation is as follows:
4.Mr Prasad is entitled to the sum of $1,915,452 by way of total damages. Dated this 7th day of June 2018
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 214/2016