Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 4753/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 15 June 2018.
1. This action and the other 2 actions, namely DCCJ 5071/2014 and DCCJ 2116/2015, concern the adverse possession claims made by various squatters occupying the common areas of Kiu Yu Mansion [1] and Kiu Fat Mansion [2] (“the Buildings”). The defendant in each of these actions is the incorporated owners of the Buildings (“the IO”). The location of the area claimed to be occupied by the plaintiff in each of these 3 actions is shown on the agreed plan (“the Agreed Plan”) annexed hereto as “Annex
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 7 cases