Tang Tim Chue v. Tang Ka Hung Robert and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 147/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 October 2018.
1. On 16 August 2018 this court gave Judgment dismissing the Appellant’s appeal against the Judgment of DHCJ Au-Yeung (now Au-Yeung J) in HCMP2506/2009. We made an order nisi that the Appellant pay the costs of the 1 st Respondent executor, which order was made absolute as no application for its variation was made within the period specified in the rules of court. We also directed that the 1 st Respondent be at liberty to file with the court a summary bill of costs to which the Appellant could r
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 147/2012 [2018] HKCA 690 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 147 OF 2012 (ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO 2506/2009) ________________________
________________________
________________________ Before: Hon Lam VP, Yuen and Kwan JJA in Court Date of 1st Respondent’s Summary Bill of Costs: 5 September 2018 Date of Appellant’s Response: 13 September 2018 Date of Judgment on Costs: 16 October 2018 _____________________________________ J U D G M E N T O N C O S T S _____________________________________ Hon Yuen (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.On 16 August 2018 this court gave Judgment dismissing the Appellant’s appeal against the Judgment of DHCJ Au-Yeung (now Au-Yeung J) in HCMP2506/2009. We made an order nisi that the Appellant pay the costs of the 1st Respondent executor, which order was made absolute as no application for its variation was made within the period specified in the rules of court. We also directed that the 1st Respondent be at liberty to file with the court a summary bill of costs to which the Appellant could respond. 2.We have considered the 1st Respondent’s summary bill of costs filed on 5 September 2018 and the Appellant’s response filed on 13 September 2018. Upon a gross sum assessment, we take the view that the 1st Respondent’s claim of $15,046 is modest and reasonable, and we order the Appellant to pay that sum by way of costs.
Applicant acting in person. 1st Respondent acting in person. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 147/2012