Secretary for Justice v. Cheng Ka Yee and Others

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 51/2018 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.

1. We are satisfied that leave should be granted on the basis that a point of law of the requisite importance is involved in this case, namely:

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.FAMC 51/2018[2018] HKCFA 49
Court
FAMC
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 51 of 2018

[2018] HKCFA 49

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 51 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 466 OF 2017)

____________________

BETWEEN

  SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Applicant
  and
  CHENG KA YEE(鄭嘉儀) 1st Respondent
  TSANG WING SHAN(曾詠珊) 2nd Respondent
  WONG PUI MAN(黃佩雯) 3rd Respondent
  U LENG KOK (余玲菊) 4th Respondent

____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Cheung PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 2 November 2018

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

1.We are satisfied that leave should be granted on the basis that a point of law of the requisite importance is involved in this case, namely:

“What is the scope of the actus reus of the offence under section 161(1)(c) of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)? In particular, is it restricted to the unauthorized extraction and use of information from a computer?”

2.We are also satisfied that leave should be granted on the substantial and grave injustice basis for the appellant to contend, subject to the conclusion reached as to the foregoing point of law, that it is reasonably arguable that the finding as to lack of dishonesty was perverse.

3.The appeal will be heard on 26 February 2019.

(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Joseph Fok)
Permanent Judge
(Andrew Cheung)
Permanent Judge

Mr David Leung, SC, DPP, Mr Robert Lee, SADPP and Ms Kasmine Hui, SPP (Ag), of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr David Boyton, instructed by T K Tsui & Co., for the 1st and 4th Respondents

Mr Duncan Percy, instructed by Kenneth W Leung & Co., for the 2nd Respondent

Mr James Tze, instructed by Raymond Luk & Co., for the 3rd Respondent