So Kai Hau v. Ysk2 Engineering Co Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 1077/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 31 July 2018.
1. Page 88, paragraph 145 and line N, “…that Wellgo should bear a greater share…” should read as “…that JMK should bear a greater share…”.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCPI 1077/2006 [2018] HKCFI 1803 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 1077 OF 2006 __________________________
__________________________ Before: The Hon. Mr Justice Bharwaney in Court Dates of Hearing: 3-6 August, 25 August 2015 Date of Judgment: 31 July 2018 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Kindly note that the following correction in the Judgment handed down by the Honourable Mr Justice Bharwaney on 31 July 2018: 1. Page 88, paragraph 145 and line N, “…that Wellgo should bear a greater share…” should read as “…that JMK should bear a greater share…”. Dated this 10th day of December 2018
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 1077/2006