Lky v. Nhp
Read the full judgment text of FCMC 11467/2017 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 27 December 2018 before Deputy Judge K. K. PANG.
Matrimonial causes – Single Joint Expert – Appointment – Valuation of equity interest – Suitability of expert – District Court – Parties unable to agree on valuation of 49% equity interest in a limited company engaged in trading of river sand and stone aggregates – Petitioner suggested Mr. Johnathan Lai of RSMHK; Respondent suggested Mr. Canson C.K. Leung of CEIBU CPA & Co – Court held Mr. Lai more suitable as experienced forensic accounting expert compared to Mr. Leung who was not a forensic expert – Mr. Lai appointed as SJE – Report to be filed by 21 March 2019 – Costs of report shared equally initially
Legal issues: Appointment of Single Joint Expert
Outcome: Appointment of Mr. Johnathan Lai as Single Joint Expert ordered
|
FCMC11467/2017 [2018]HKFC238 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NUMBER 11467 OF 2017 ----------------------------
---------------------------- Coram: Before Deputy Judge K. K. PANG (disposal on the papers) Date of the parties’ Joint Submissions: 20 November 2018 Date of Petitioner’s Further Submissions: 14 December 2018 Date of Respondent’s Further Submissions: 14 December 2018 Date of Handing Down this Ruling: 27 December 2018 -------------------------------------------- RULING (Appointment of Single Joint Expert) -------------------------------------------- 1.By the order dated 17 May 2018, it is directed that the parties shall agree the value of 49% equity interest of a HK limited company (the “said company”) that was held under the name of the respondent husband (“H”), failing which single joint expert (“SJE”) be agreed and appointed by all parties to prepare a single joint valuation report on the same. The parties have been unable to reach agreement on the valuation. Unfortunately, neither could they have been agreed on the appointment of SJE. The parties were directed to write to the court each giving one suggestion of SJE, together with his C.V., estimated time for the completion of the valuation report and estimated costs, whereby the court would give further directions on the choice of SJE pursuant to Order 38 r.4A(2). Both parties wrote to the court. 2.The petitioner wife (“W”) suggested Mr. Johnathan Lai (“Mr. Lai”) of RSMHK, and H suggested Mr. Canson C.K. Leung (“Mr. Leung”) of CEIBU CPA & Co. Mr. Lai has indicated that, upon receipt of all documentation required, he needs about 4 to 6 weeks for the report. Mr. Leung did not give estimated time for the completion of the valuation report. Mr. Lai’s fee is HK$200,000 to 300,000, and Mr. Leung’s fee is HK$100,000. I take notice that the instant case is far from a straightforward nature. The principal activity of the said company was engaged in trading of river sand and stone aggregates. H was and is one of the two directors of the company. According to the audited accounts, for the financial years ended 31 March 2016 and 31 March 2017, the said company had total net assets of HK$1,219,990 and HK$2,119,578 and profits of HK$1,330,015 and HK$899,588 respectively. The scope of the SJE’swork is expected to include, inter alia, understanding the business model and operation of the said company and selecting the appropriate valuation method(s) amongst the most commonly used valuation methods, such as net asset approach, discounted cash flow approach and/or market approach and assessing the minority value of 49% equity interest held by H. On this note, I have reviewed the C.V. of Mr. Lai and Mr. Leung. I am satisfied that Mr. Lai is an experienced forensic accounting expert, while Mr. Leung, an experienced CPA, is not a forensic expert. In the premises, I consider that Mr. Lai, rather than Mr. Leung, may be more suitable to be appointed as SJE for the preparation of the valuation report in the instant case. By reason of matters aforesaid, I am persuaded to appoint Mr. Lai as SJE for the valuation of the said company. I give the parties 6 weeks to send out the joint instructions and the necessary materials and informations, and further 6 weeks for the completion of the valuation report. 3.IT IS therefore ORDERED that:
Terry Yeung & Lai, Solicitors for the Petitioner Wife W.F. So & Co,, Solicitors for the Respondent Husband |
Further hearings and rulings under FCMC 11467/2017