Q v. Commissioner of Registration
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 229/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 February 2019.
1. In paragraph 34, line H, “Given that the applicants’ had not undergone any such operation” should read “Given that the applicants had not undergone any such operation”.
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 229/2015, 154 & 189/2017 [2019] HKCFI 295 HCAL 229/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 229 OF 2015 _______________
_______________ and HCAL 154/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 154 OF 2017 _______________
_______________ and HCAL 189/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 189 OF 2017 _______________
Before: Hon Au J in Court Dates of Hearing: 9 - 11 January 2018 Date of Judgment: 1 February 2019 Date of Corrigendum: 8 February 2019 ----------------------------------- C O R R I G E N D U M ----------------------------------- 1.In paragraph 34, line H, “Given that the applicants’ had not undergone any such operation” should read “Given that the applicants had not undergone any such operation”. 2.In paragraph 42, line O – P, “These contentions are in substantive in line with the dissenting judgment of Judge Ranzoni at paragraphs 11 - 25.” should read “These contentions are in substance in line with the dissenting judgment of Judge Ranzoni at paragraphs 11 - 25.”. 3.In paragraph 76, line I, “although not with some difficulty” should read “although not without some difficulty”. 4.In paragraph 96, line E – F, “it must be regarded as proper fully informed consent.” should read “it must be regarded as a proper fully informed consent.” 5.In paragraph 122, line C, “The applicants therefore fail under all the grounds raised in these judicial review on merits.” should read “The applicants therefore fail under all the grounds raised in these judicial reviews on merits.” 6.In paragraph 124, line J, “to be taxed if not agree” should read “to be taxed if not agreed”. 7.In paragraph 127, line D, “amongst” should read “amongst others”.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 229/2015