HKSAR v. Wong Ho Yin

Case No.DCCC 497/2018[2019] HKDC 280
Court
District Court
Date04 Feb 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%

DCCC 497/2018

[2019] HKDC 280

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO 497 OF 2018

----------------------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  WONG HO YIN  

----------------------------

Before: HH Judge K Lo
Date: 4 February 2019
Present: Mr Wayne Lee Wing Yin, Public Prosecutor of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr Henry Ma Ka Fan, instructed by Y K Lau & Chu, assigned by Director of Legal Aid for the defendant
Offence: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

--------------------------------------

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

--------------------------------------

1.Defendant is convicted on his own plea and agreement to summary of facts to trafficking in a dangerous drug.

2.Defendant had a previous conviction but not similar.

3.He is aged 24 and has received education up to Form 3 level.  He is single and had worked in various jobs.  At time of arrest, he is a clerk in a finance company earning about $20,000 a month. 

4.It is said that he is a cocaine drug addict at the time of offence.  In the antecedent statement, he says he consumed daily 3 to 4 grammes of cocaine. The contents of this antecedent statement is agreed by him, but later when this court asked for the source of income for him to support this drug habit, he clarified that, in fact, his daily consumption is only 1 to 2 grammes.

5.The drugs in question is 22.50 grammes of cocaine, value of which is around $29,369.

6.For trafficking of cocaine, following the authority of Pedro Nel Rojas [1994] 2 HKCLR 69, and adopting the guidelines in the case of R v Lau Tak Ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370, the appropriate sentencing starting point is 5 years 11 months.

7.Defendant said himself that he is a drug addict, consuming cocaine and that he trafficked in cocaine to support his drug habit.

8.Although it is not a case where significant portion of the drugs seized is for defendant’s own consumption, I am willing to accept that some of these drugs is for his own consumption, and I therefore adjust the sentencing starting point to 69 months instead.

9.Having considered the mitigation advanced by defence counsel, the most useful mitigation is defendant’s own guilty plea, of which he is entitled to one-third sentencing discount.

10.Accordingly, defendant is sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment for this offence.

 
 

  ( K Lo )
  District Judge

Related Cases
Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first

HKSAR v. Majid Muhammad

DCCC 75/2015 · District Court
28 Apr 2015
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Chang Kwok Hei

DCCC 593/2013 · District Court
04 Sep 2013
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Tam Tsz Chung

DCCC 425/2013 · District Court
01 Aug 2013
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Wong Kwan Ching

DCCC 916/2013 · District Court
08 Nov 2013
2 shared citations