HKSAR v. Wong Ho Yin

Case No.DCCC 829/2011
Court
District Court
Date24 Oct 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%

DCCC 829/2011

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 829 OF 2011

--------------------

  HKSAR  
  v.  
  WONG HO YIN  

--------------------

Before: H.H. Judge E. Yip
Date: 24 October 2011 at 10:23 a.m.
Present: Mr KWOK Wing Lung, Senior Public Prosecutor, of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr LEE Tak Tung Paul, instructed by M/s. Sam Fu & Co assignedby D.L.A. for Defendant
Offence: (1) Trafficking in a dangerous drug(販運危險藥物)

-------------------------------

Reasons for Sentence

-------------------------------

Charge and facts

1.The Defendant pleads guilty to trafficking in a dangerous drug, namely 11.86 g of a solid containing 9.17 g of cocaine.  In the early morning on 18 May 2011, 2 C&E officers stopped the Defendant and a male at the staircase of a residential car park in Lai Chi Kok, Kowloon.  From his jeans pocket was found a bag containing the said drug in 42 smaller bags.  Under caution he said the drug was for self-consumption. 

The street value of the drug was estimated to be $21,189.

Personal background and mitigation

2.He was 17 when arrested and is 18 now.  He ceased schooling after F. 1.  He worked as an air-conditioning worker for 3 months, then a cook in a Japanese restaurant before arrest.  He has been a drug abuser since 4 years ago.  He committed the present offence to make money to help repay his father’s credit card loans. 

3.He has 3 previous records, 2 for violence and 1 for possession of drug, resulting in 18 months’ probation, which was satisfactorily completed before the present offence. 

4.Based on his history of addiction and his detention for 5 months so far, his counsel expressly wishes for a non-institutional sentence.  I also find a prison term more appropriate. 

Prison sentence for cocaine traffickers

5.In Attorney General v Rojas [1994] 1 HKC 342, which was a case of trafficking in cocaine, Silke VP observed that the psychotropic harm of cocaine was comparable to that of heroin.  The sentencing guidelines in R v Lau Tak-ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370, which set out the tariff sentences for trafficking in heroin, is equally applicable.  For cocaine up to 10 g, the sentence shall be 2–5 years. 

Sentencing this Defendant

6.Although the Defendant claimed self-consumption, his counsel has informed me that the said drug was actually for trafficking, his role being a courier for reward.  I take 4 years as the starting point. His plea of guilty shall attract a one-third discount.  The sentence shall be 32 months. 

( E. Yip )
District Judge
Related Cases
Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first

HKSAR v. Majid Muhammad

DCCC 75/2015 · District Court
28 Apr 2015
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Hui Kam Ki

HCCC 516/2013 · High Court CFI
08 Aug 2014
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Rios Henao Jose Leonardo

HCCC 182/2014 · High Court CFI
14 Jul 2014
2 shared citations

HKSAR v. Chang Kwok Hei

DCCC 593/2013 · District Court
04 Sep 2013
2 shared citations