Read the full judgment text of FCMC 14803/2013 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 28 February 2019 before Deputy District Court Judge Pang Ka Kwong.
Divorce – Ancillary Relief – Leave to Appeal – New Evidence – Future Needs – Property Sale – District Court Ordinance (Cap 336) s.63A – Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 – Husband and wife applied for leave to appeal ancillary relief orders – Court refused leave for both parties – No costs order.
Legal issues: Admissibility of new evidence (urn value) · Calculation of future needs (19 years vs 9 years) · Sale of property 8/F 38F (son's interest) · Consideration of wife's pension, insurance, and urn value · Wife's appeal regarding housing and sale of properties
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused for both parties.