Ng Tat Kuen v. Tam Che Fu and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 896/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of First Instance judgment was delivered on 3 May 2019 before Bharwaney J.

1.  Page 9, paragraph 19 and line J, “I find that the appropriate full life and working life multipliers…” should read as “I find that the appropriate full whole life and working life multipliers…”.

Outcome: {"disposition": "", "orders": [], "sentencing_math": ""}

Cited by 12 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 896/2013[2019] HKCFI 1191
Court
Court of First Instance
Date03 May 2019
JudgeBharwaney J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 896/2013

[2019] HKCFI 1191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 896 OF 2013

__________________________

BETWEEN
  NG TAT KUEN Plaintiff
and
  TAM CHE FU(譚志富) 1st Defendant
  TAM KWOK WAI(譚國維)trading as
WING FAI TRANSPORTATION CO.(榮暉運輸公司)
2nd Defendant
  DSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
(德爾斯控股有限公司)
formerly known as DIRECT SALE CENTRE LIMITED
3rd Defendant
  EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE FUND BOARD 4th Defendant

__________________________

Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Bharwaney in Court

Date of Hearing: 13 September 2018

Date of Judgment: 3 May 2019

____________________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________________________


Kindly note that the following corrections in the Judgment given out by the Honourable Mr Justice Bharwaney on 3 May 2019:

1.  Page 9, paragraph 19 and line J, “I find that the appropriate full life and working life multipliers…” should read as “I find that the appropriate full whole life and working life multipliers…”.

2.  Page 10, paragraph 25 and line N, “The find that the plaintiff has incurred …” should read as “The I find that the plaintiff has incurred …”.

3.  Page 10, paragraph 26 and line P, “The claim for tonic food and nourishing soup are agreed by…” should read as “The claim for tonic food and nourishing soup are is agreed by…”.

4.  Page 11, paragraph 27 and line C, “…in the total sum of $153,860, which are supported by receipts …” should read as “…in the total sum of $153,860, which are is supported by receipts …”.

5.  Page 30, footnote 56, “See JR v. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017 EWHC 1245 (QB)…” should read as “See JR v. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017 [2017] EWHC 1245 (QB)…”.



Dated this 22nd day of May 2019

  (Jessica P.W. To)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Bharwaney