Read the full judgment text of HCPI 354/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 April 2022.
1. The Plaintiff was a plumber employed by the 1 st Defendant (“Mr Yip”) to work at a construction site (“the Site”) which was under the control and management of the 2 nd and 3 rd Defendants (“D2” and “D3” respectively). D2 was a sub-contractor of D3 who was the principal contractor. D2 sub-contracted the plumbing work of the Site to Mr Yip.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 10 cases