Read the full judgment text of HCMA 300/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 October 2018.
1. The appellant was the second defendant in the original trial. He and the first defendant were charged with one count of having the custody or control of counterfeit notes [1] and both of them pleaded not guilty. The magistrate [2] convicted them after trial. The appellant was at first alleged to have possessed counterfeit banknotes, some of which looked like Hong Kong currency and some of which looked like foreign currency. The appellant’s conviction concerned only the counterfeits that looke
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases