Read the full judgment text of CACC 202/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 July 2019.
1. The applicant originally faced five charges of blackmail, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210, which spanned a period of almost 18 months and involved making use of a false, backdated sick leave certificate that was obtained from a medical doctor (“the doctor”) and then used as a tool to extort millions of dollars from him; initially, by three men including the applicant acting in concert (Charges 1, 2 and 3), and later, by the applicant acting on his own account
Cited by 4 cases