Re Tulachan Bam Prasad
Read the full judgment text of CACV 7/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 June 2019.
1. On page 6, in line C - D, paragraph [10] should read as [15]. In line M, paragraph [11] should read as [16].
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 7/2019 [2019] HKCA 652 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 7 OF 2019 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 246 OF 2018) _______________
_______________ Before: Hon Chu, Barma and Au JJA in Court Date of Judgment: 14 June 2019 Date of Corrigendum: 7 August 2019 ___________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ___________________________ 1. On page 6, in line C - D, paragraph [10] should read as [15]. In line M, paragraph [11] should read as [16]. 2. On page 7, in line H - I, paragraph [12] should read as [17]. 3. On Page 8, in line O, paragraph [13] should read as [18]. 4. On Page 9, in line H, paragraph [15] should read as [19]. In line J - K, paragraph [14] should read as [20]. In line R - S, paragraph [15] should read as [21]. 5. On Page 10, in line F, paragraph [16] should read as [22]. In line H, paragraph [16] should read as [23]. In line N, paragraph [18] should read as [24]. 6. On page 11, in line A - B, paragraph [20] should read as [25]. In line G - H, paragraph [21] should read as [26].
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 7/2019