HKSAR v. Lam Hing Wan
Read the full judgment text of CACC 387/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 November 2018 before Macrae VP, Zervos JA.
1. In paragraph 37, reference to “Charge 1” should be replaced with “Charge 2” and reference to “Charge 2” should be replaced with “Charge 3”.
Outcome: {"disposition": "", "orders": [], "sentencing_math": ""}
Cited by 6 cases · Cites 1 case
|
CACC 387/2016 [2018] HKCA 686 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 387 OF 2016 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO 378 OF 2014) _______________
_______________
_______________ C O R R I G E N D U M _______________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 14 November 2018: 1. In paragraph 37, reference to “Charge 1” should be replaced with “Charge 2” and reference to “Charge 2” should be replaced with “Charge 3”.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 387/2016