Sino Channel Holdings Ltd v. v.s. Faith Investment Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 123/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 May 2020.

1. Page 5, paragraph 6, line J, “Sino Channel commenced an action ” should read “Sino Channel commenced an application ”.

Cited by 12 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACV 123/2019[2020] HKCA 311[2020] 2 HKLRD 1286
Court
Court of Appeal
Date13 May 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 123/2019
and CACV 130/2019
[2020] HKCA 311
(Heard together)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 123 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM LDBM 211/2015)

__________________________

BETWEEN

SINO CHANNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED Applicant
and
VAST FAITH INVESTMENT LIMITED Respondent

__________________________

AND

CIVIL APPEAL NO 130 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM LDBM 117/2016)

__________________________

BETWEEN

THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF GRANDMARK Applicant
and
SINO CHANNEL HOLDINGS LIMITED Respondent

__________________________

(HEARD TOGETHER)

Before: Hon Lam VP, Cheung and Au JJA in Court

Dates of Written Submissions: 28 February, 13 March and 7 April 2020

Date of Judgment: 13 May 2020

Date of Corrigendum: 14 May 2020

Date of 2nd Corrigendum: 28 May 2020

_________________________

2nd CORRIGENDUM

_________________________

Please note the following 2nd corrigendum for the Judgment dated the 13th May 2020: -

1. Page 5, paragraph 6, line J, “Sino Channel commenced an action” should read “Sino Channel commenced an application”.

2. Page 6, paragraph 8, between line B and C, “commenced an action in the” should read “commenced an application in the”.

3. Page 6, paragraph 9, between line I and J, “Both actions were heard together” should read “Both applications were heard together”.

Dated the 28th day of May 2020

(Stanley Hui)
for Registrar, High Court