HKSAR v. Leung Pak Tim and Others
Read the full judgment text of DCCC 813/2019 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 September 2020.
1. Paragraph 7 on page 3, Line S should read “…because there was an unidentified liquid spilled which caused officers…”.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
DCCC 813/2019 [2020] HKDC 838 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 813 OF 2019 ---------------------------
Before: Her Honour Judge A J Woodcock in Court Dates of Hearing: 4 September 2020 and 24 September 2020 Date of Reasons for Sentence: 24 September 2020 Date of Corrigendum: 25 September 2020 ______________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ______________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Sentence delivered on 24 September 2020: 1.Paragraph 7 on page 3, Line S should read “…because there was an unidentified liquid spilled which caused officers…”. 2.Paragraph 11 on page 5, Line F should read “… This CCTV footage does not support a mitigation letter that he is not a violent person …”. 3.Paragraph 14 on page 5, Line U should read “… they took part in a riot outside Shop 398, Charge 1.”. 4.Paragraph 22 on page 8, Line M should read “… wearing the same orange pink T-shirt at around 22:30 hours. …”. 5.Paragraph 31 on page 11, Line C should read “… trying to break through a police cordon protecting the main entrance…” . 6.Paragraph 78 on page 24, Line I should read “… hence the higher starting point for Charge 3.”
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 813/2019