West Kowloon Cultural District Authority v. Aig Insurance Hong Kong Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 82/2020 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 September 2020.

1. In paragraph 11 (2) at page 4 line E, “it plainly included a claim for losses which the Defendant had…” should read “it plainly included a claim for losses which the Plaintiff had…”.

Cited by 5 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACV 82/2020[2020] HKCA 778
Court
Court of Appeal
Date18 Sep 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 82/2020

[2020] HKCA 778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 82 OF 2020

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA 2039/2018)

________________________

BETWEEN

  WEST KOWLOON CULTURAL DISTRICT AUTHORITY Plaintiff
  and  
  AIG INSURANCE HONG KONG LIMITED Defendant

________________________

Before: Hon Lam VP and Yuen JA in Court
Dates of Written Submissions: 2, 16 and 23 July 2020
Date of Judgment: 18 September 2020

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum for the Decision dated 18 September 2020:-

1.In paragraph 11 (2) at page 4 line E, “it plainly included a claim for losses which the Defendant had…” should read “it plainly included a claim for losses which the Plaintiff had…”.

2.In paragraph 23 at page 8 line M, “included a claim for losses which the Defendant had not…” should read “included a claim for losses which the Plaintiff had not…”.

Dated this 25th day of September, 2020

  (Lisa Leung)
  for Registrar, High Court