HKSAR v. Omogo Stephen Okuta
Read the full judgment text of CACC 66/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 April 2021.
1. In paragraph 56, in the antepenultimate sentence, replace “which” with “who”.
Cited by 6 cases
|
CACC 66/2019 [2021] HKCA 392 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 66 OF 2019 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 323 OF 2015) _______________
_______________ Before: Hon Macrae VP and Hon Zervos JA in Court Date of Reasons for Judgment: 9 April 2021 Date of Corrigendum: 12 April 2021 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Judgment dated 9 April 2021 : 1. In paragraph 56, in the antepenultimate sentence, replace “which” with “who”. 2. In paragraph 62, in the last sentence, replace “the woman” with “X” 3. In paragraph 66, first sentence, insert “historical or” before “anecdotal”
| ||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 66/2019