Wong Kwei Piu v. Chow Chi Cheung t/a Sun Lee Co
Read the full judgment text of DCEC 1082/2017 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 31 May 2022.
1. In the table of paragraph 203, under item (G) “Future medical expenses”, a new row be added: “ Less: Advance payment…$193,500 ”; and the “Total” amount be amended from “$865,190” to “ $671,690 ”;
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
DCEC 1082/2017 & DCPI 2318/2017 [2022] HKDC 437 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO 1082 OF 2017 -------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
-------------------------------------- IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 2318 OF 2017 --------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- Before: Her Honour Judge Levy in Court Dates of Hearing: 7, 13 and 14 December 2021 Date of Respondent/Defendant’s Written Closing Submissions: 21 December 2021 Date of Applicant/Plaintiff’s Written Closing Submissions: 24 December 2021 Date of Respondent/Defendant’s Written Supplemental Submissions: 24 December 2021 Date of Judgment: 31 May 2022 Date of Corrigendum: 20 June 2022 -------------------------- CORRIGENDUM -------------------------- Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 31 May 2022:- 1. In the table of paragraph 203, under item (G) “Future medical expenses”, a new row be added: “Less: Advance payment…$193,500”; and the “Total” amount be amended from “$865,190” to “$671,690”; 2. Paragraph 204 be amended as: “…the damages that I have awarded for the PI Action in the sum of $671,690 shall therefore be reduced by…”; 3. Paragraph 225 be amended as: “ …reduced by the conceded income of $6,000 Piu received from Chan Keung and the advance payment of $193,500, making the net total of $147,027.”; 4. In the table of paragraph 235, the amount of item (B) “Section 10” be amended from “$340,527” to “$147,027”; the whole row “Less: Advance payment…$193,000” be deleted; and the “Total” amount be amended from “192,476” to “191,976”; 5. Paragraph 246 be amended as: “…for the total sum of $191,976”; and 6. Paragraph 249 be amended as: “…in favour of the plaintiff (Piu) for the total sum of $671,690. By the proviso to s 26(1), the amount of $671,690 shall be reduced by the EC compensation of $191,976. Thus the total damages as reduced are in the sum of $479,714 ($671,690 - $191,976).”. Dated the 20th day of June 2022
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCEC 1082/2017